EPA Issues Periodic Monitoring Guidance
On September 15, 1998, the EPA has released its Periodic Monitoring Guidance. This
Guidance is intended to be used by Permitting Authorities and EPA Regional Offices
in the development of Title V monitoring requirements.
Periodic Monitoring data is basis upon which a Title V Responsible Officials is to
personally certify to a source's annual compliance status. This has become an issue
of increasing importance given EPA's shift in enforcement focus away from the source
and towards the Responsible Official as an individual.
In the Guidance:
EPA reaffirmed its position that:
- Responsibility for Compliance Rest Upon the Source
- Compliance obligation is continuous, and
- Under all anticipated operating conditions.
EPA states that the purpose of Periodic Monitoring is to provide
a basis for a source to certify its compliance status.
- must yield reliable data
- from the relevant (averaging) time period
- that are representative of a sources compliance status
- with the applicable requirement
- over its anticipated operating range.
Key Provisions Require that::
- Data must be reliable
- Acceptable Periodic Monitoring should consider all relevant factors including:
- Margin of Compliance
- Source Variability
- Add-on Controls
- Available Data
- Technical and Economic Considerations
- Parametric Data can be used as an enforceable limit
- Should specify a range
- Document site-specific developed relationships
- Periodically verify the continuing validity
- Use periodic stack tests to verify direct compliance
- Information must be Enforceable as a Practical Matter - elements include
- Frequency of Monitoring
- Procedures Used to Check Data Validity
- Data Averaging Period
- Minimum Data Availability
- Prompt Reports of Deviations and Summary Reports
- Rational for selection of monitoring method must be clear and documented, and made
readily available to the public.
- EPA states that this guidance in No-Way affects the use of periodic monitoring
data under the EPA's Credible Evidence Rule. (The US Court of Appeals dismissed
industry challenges to the Rule on August 14, 1998)